As part of the 2013 OPPS Final Rule, CMS made major changes to how it will reimburse facilities for separately payable drugs and how it will calculate APC relative weights. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, review the most significant changes in the final rule.
Q: A patient went to the operating room under anesthesia for cataract extraction and repair of retinal detachment of the same eye. The surgeon successfully removed the cataract. The surgeon then accessed the back of the eye to begin to repair the detachment. After reviewing the condition of this eye area, the surgeon determined that the eye was in such bad shape it could not be saved, so the detachment was not repaired and surgery was ended. The patient was under anesthesia and the retinal detachment repair procedure was begun (although barely) but then cancelled. Should we report this procedure since the facility incurred expenses for the surgical attempt at repair?
Q: How should we bill for the physician in the following situation? A patient who has end-stage renal disease (ESRD) comes into a hospital’s emergency department (ED) with an emergent condition (dialysis access clotted or chest pain that is ruled out), but misses his or her dialysis treatment. Part of the treatment is dialysis performed in the ED or as an outpatient. The hospital bills G0257 (unscheduled or emergency dialysis treatment for an ESRD patient in a hospital outpatient department that is not certified as an ESRD facility) as per CY 2003 OPPS Final Rule guidelines and Pub 100-04, Chapter 4, section 200.2
CMS announced changes to reporting therapy services—the biggest operational change for 2013—in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule instead of the OPPS final rule. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain the changes to therapy reporting and molecular pathology coding.
Q: Is nursing documentation of completion of physician-ordered procedures, such as splinting/strapping, Foley catheter insertion, etc., sufficient to assign a CPT ® code for billing the procedure on the facility side in the ED?
As part of the 2013 OPPS final rule, CMS finalized a clarification to 42 CFR 419.2(b) concerning packaged services. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how this clarification could cause confusion in the future if hospitals are audited by third-party payers or by Medicare contractors who do not fully understand the intent of the language or how CMS develops payment rates.
Q: CPT ® code 85660 (sickling of RBC, reduction) has a medically unlikely edit of one unit. We test blood for transfusion for sickle cell before we provide it to a sickle cell patient. If we test three units of blood prior to administering the blood to the patient, which modifier is more appropriate: -59 (distinct procedural service) or -91 (repeat laboratory test)?
Q: What CPT ® code best describes the Bier block procedure? We are toiling over this and the most recent CPT Assistant says to use 64999 (unlisted procedure, nervous system). But the article referenced is from 2004. We just want to make sure there is nothing more recent.
The rules for coding for facilities and physicians are basically the same for most services, but coders follow different rules for appending certain modifiers. Christi Sarasin, CCS, CCDS, CPC-H, FCS , Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC , and Peggy Blue, MPH, CPC, CCS-P, separate physician and facility rules for using modifiers -26, -TC, and -79.
Q: It appears that one requirement for using CPT ® codes 15002–15005 with application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is that the wound must be healing by primary intention. Can you explain this? We have never used these codes with preparation for vacuum assisted closure (VAC) placement, but it doesn't make sense, as NPWT is almost always used for wounds healing by secondary intention. Our physicians appreciate any clarification.
CMS proposed extending the delay on enforcement of physician supervision rules for critical access hospitals and small and rural hospitals with 100 or fewer beds for one final year as part of the 2013 OPPS proposed rule. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, and Jugna Shah, MPH, detail some of the more significant proposals for 2013.
QUESTION: I work for a gastrointestinal (GI) practice and I have a question regarding the correct sequence for adding diagnosis codes to a claim. I have advised our physicians and billers that the primary diagnosis code is always the reason for the visit. I am a little confused about the remaining diagnosis codes the physician will write down in no specific order. Billers will report codes in the order the physicians write down the diagnoses and not always the reason for the visit. For example, a patient is referred for a consult due to weight loss. The patient comes for the consult and the physicians may put down 787.29 (other dysphagia), 401.1 (benign hypertension), 783.21 (abnormal loss of weight), 787.99 (change in bowel habits) in this order and leave it up to the person entering the info to figure it out. I would report 783.21 first since that was the reason for the visit but then I’ve been putting the GI codes next and then anything else last. What is the correct sequence when adding diagnosis codes to a claim?
Accurate reporting of observation services depends on a lot of factors. Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, and Cheryl Staley, RHIA, CCS, walk though five case studies to explain the ins and outs of observation coding.
QUESTION: I work in an urgent care setting and need to know if we can bill an administration code for injection of Toradol. For example, a patient comes in, and the provider performs an E/M and administers 60mg Toradol intramuscular. I have not been charging for it, thinking it’s bundled into the E/M.
CMS is proposing two major changes as part of the 2013 OPPS proposed rule, released July 6. One has to do with how CMS proposes to calculate APC relative weights; the other addresses the reimbursement level for separately payable drugs and biologicals without pass-through status. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, discuss the proposed changes for OPPS payment.
Physicians and facilities use the same codes to report evaluation and management (E/M) levels for emergency department (ED) services, but follow different rules. Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, and Raemarie Jimenez, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CANPC, CRHC, explain how to correctly choose the most appropriate E/M code for ED services.
Some wounds and conditions don’t respond to conventional therapies and treatment modalities. In those cases, providers may consider hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO). Gloria Miller CPC, CPMA, and Todd Sommer, DO, DPM, CWS, review the conditions eligible for HBO therapy and correct code assignment for these services.
