Q: My hospital’s coding team keeps having trouble distinguishing between J44.0 (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute lower respiratory infection) and J44.1 (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with [acute] exacerbation. Is there any guidance out there that can help clarify their differences? We would appreciate any help.
James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, discusses bundled payments and the importance of applying proper ICD-10-CM/PCS-pertinent documentation and coding principles to remain compliant.
With a new year underway, providers likely need to get a handle on some key new modifiers, as well as important changes to an existing modifier and the deletion of a modifier that previously raised a lot of questions and operational concerns.
The focus for clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists has historically been on the inpatient hospital stay. Review of the chart for conditions that are not fully documented and/or evidence of conditions not documented at all has been standard practice.
The 2017 ICD-10-CM updates included a significant number of additions to digestive system diagnoses, especially codes for pancreatitis and intestinal infections. These codes are largely focused in the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and a review of the anatomy of this body system could help improve accurate documentation interpretation and code selection.
Optimal ICD-10 accuracy cannot be achieved by simply looking up a code in an encoder or book. Knowing the rationale for what you are coding, why you are applying one code versus another, and having the knowledge base to correctly apply the 2017 Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are the ingredients necessary for accurate clinical coding.
The 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting brought many changes and updates for coders, and present-on-admission (POA) reporting was not excluded. Completely understanding POA guidelines is necessary for any inpatient coder.
In promoting ICD-10-CM coding integrity and compliance, cerebrovascular disease represents one of the greatest challenges for providers and coders alike. It seems that clinicians, ICD-10-CM, and risk-adjusters (those who create the DRG system), do not sing the same tune.
Clinical validation denials (CVD) result from a review by a clinician, such as a registered nurse, contractor medical director, or therapist, who concludes retrospectively that a patient was not really afflicted by a condition that was documented in the medical record and coded by the coder.
