QUESTION: I work for a gastrointestinal (GI) practice and I have a question regarding the correct sequence for adding diagnosis codes to a claim. I have advised our physicians and billers that the primary diagnosis code is always the reason for the visit. I am a little confused about the remaining diagnosis codes the physician will write down in no specific order. Billers will report codes in the order the physicians write down the diagnoses and not always the reason for the visit. For example, a patient is referred for a consult due to weight loss. The patient comes for the consult and the physicians may put down 787.29 (other dysphagia), 401.1 (benign hypertension), 783.21 (abnormal loss of weight), 787.99 (change in bowel habits) in this order and leave it up to the person entering the info to figure it out. I would report 783.21 first since that was the reason for the visit but then I’ve been putting the GI codes next and then anything else last. What is the correct sequence when adding diagnosis codes to a claim?
QUESTION: I work in an urgent care setting and need to know if we can bill an administration code for injection of Toradol. For example, a patient comes in, and the provider performs an E/M and administers 60mg Toradol intramuscular. I have not been charging for it, thinking it’s bundled into the E/M.
Q. When is it appropriate to append modifier -74 (procedures discontinued after anesthesia administration or after the procedure has begun) or -73 (procedures discontinued prior to anesthesia) instead of to modifier -52 (reduced service)? Is there more than anesthesia that determines their use? The report below was coded with CPT ® 62311 (injection[s] of diagnostic or therapeutic substance[s]…; lumbar or sacral [caudal]). I asked the coder if modifier -74 should be appended, and the coder said that -52 should be appended. Is this correct? Procedure: Attempted lumbar midline interlaminar epidural steroid injection L5-S1 with fluoroscopy After identifying the L5-S1 interlaminar space fluoroscopically, the skin was sterilely prepped and draped. The skin and subcutaneous tissue were anesthetized with 1% lidocaine. Utilizing a loss of resistance technique and intermittent fluoroscopic guidance, an 18 gauge Tuohy needle was utilized to approach the epidural space. I was not able to successfully identify the epidural space secondary to encountered resistance. The needle depth was checked on lateral views and noted to be superficial to the epidural space when resistance was encountered. We were going to utilize a caudal approach, however skin breakdown was noted. At this point, I elected to have her return for care in 2 weeks and get the skin breakdown in the caudal area treated.
QUESTION: A patient complained of intractable pain from compression fracture (sustained the day prior to admission). The guidelines state if pain is not documented as acute or chronic, don't assign codes from the 338 category. Should we query the physician if the pain was acute or chronic rather than just using the fracture code if it appears that pain control was the main reason for the visit?
QUESTION: Our laboratory medical director sent out a notification to our medical staff, patient care departments, and order entry personnel that a physician order that read “CBC” or “CBC with differential” would be completed as a CBC with automated or manual differential and coded using CPT ® code 85025 (blood count; complete [CBC], automated [Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC, and platelet count] and automated differential WBC count). Should we code 85025 when the order just reads CBC and when we do a manual differential with the CBC?
QUESTION: The vendor for our cochlear implants has stated it’s standard to provide our operating suite with the cochlear device and two external speech processors. Should we report HCPCS Level II code L8614 (cochlear device, includes all internal and external components) for the one device and two external speech processors even though one processor is sent home with the patient? If so this means that we should charge the patient for the device and two processors as one price under revenue code 278.
QUESTION: I've always coded labile hypertension with ICD-9-CM code 401.9 (unspecified essential hypertension) because I couldn't find a more specific one. My supervisor stated that I must use ICD-9-CM code 796.2 (elevated blood pressure reading without diagnosis of hypertension) because it means the patient's blood pressure was high without a history of hypertension. The physician's diagnosis is labile hypertension. What code would you use?
QUESTION: When would you use the table labeled as not otherwise classified drugs at the end of the HCPCS Level II Table of Drugs and Biologicals? Many other drugs are not assigned a HCPCS code and are not in this table.
QUESTION: We are a small anesthesia group and we are concerned about the specificity for ICD-10-CM. If we submit a claim with an unspecified code and the surgeon submits a claim with more specificity, will we still get paid?
