Medical necessity establishes the foundation for evaluation and management (E/M) code selection and supports the need to services provided to the patient. Peggy Stilley, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, COBGC, ACS-OB , and Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explain how to define, determine, and defend medical necessity for E/M codes.
The AMA significantly changed how coders report cervicocerebral imaging in 2013. Andrea Clark, RHIA, CCS, CPC-H, and David Zielske, MD, CIRCC, CPC?H, CCC, CCS, RCC, discuss the changes and provide tips for coding these services.
Coding debridement of ulcers requires that coders know the type, location, and depth of the ulcer and the treatment provided. Gloria Miller, CPC, and Robert S. Gold, MD, review the clinical and coding aspects of ulcer debridement.
ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes mellitus will look very different from the ICD-9-CM coding . Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer, explains what coders need to know to code diabetes in ICD-10-CM.
Even experienced coders struggle to determine when to append modifiers -58, -78 and -79 because they are very similar in definition, but very different in scope and usage. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, reveals the nuances coders must understand to correctly use these modifiers.
Coders use the same CPT ® codes to report outpatient services whether they are coding physician or facility services. Jaci Johnson, CPC,CPC-H,CPMA,CEMC,CPC- I, and Judy Wilson, CPC, CPC-H, CPCO, CPC-P, CPPM, CPCI, CANPC, CMRS, examine the similarities and differences between coding in the two settings.
General equivalence mapping (GEM) is a good tool to use to convert ICD-9-CM codes to ICD-10-CM, but the maps are only a tool. Lori Andersen, MS, and Patrick Romano, MD, MPH, explain to use GEMs as part of your ICD-10 coding transition.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 31% of all American adults have high blood pressure, so odds are coders see the condition documented often. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer , compares coding for hypertension in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.
With no national guidelines in place for facilities to use to determine evaluation and management (E/M) level, coders must apply their facility’s guidelines when coding an outpatient visit. Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, and Joanne M. Becker, RHIT, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, use three ED case studies to highlight potential pitfalls for ED E/M leveling.
Evaluation and management (E/M) coding is incredibly subjective. Two coders can look at the same documentation and choose two different E/M levels and both will be able to justify their choice. Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer , Lori Owens, RHIT, CCS, and Deborah Robb, BSHA, CPC, discuss how electronic medical records can complicate E/M coding even more.
